Section 1
1. Why is important for farmers to separate GM crops from non-GM crops?
Because consumers around the world demand so to know what they consume.
2. What uncertainties are facing farmers surrounding GM foods?
It can be mixed up in the long chain between the farmer and the consumer (retailers, distributers, processors).
3. Why are the biotech companies worried?
They are worried about the long termbusiness prospects for their technology. The investors backing them are not sure to put so much money in a product that the cunsumers might dislike.
Section 2
4. List 5 benefits of GM foods.
The crops can repel any kind of bloghts or insects.
The crops can stand the herbicides that kills the weeds around.
There will be a better nutritional value.
These plants will grow faster.
This food will taste better.
5. List 5 disadvantages of GM foods
It is not properly tested.
There might be allergic reactions to genetic changes that are not completely understood.
Foreign genes in these plants can pass into the wild to create unkillable "superweeds".
These plant could harm some beneficial insects.
These plants could stimulate pesticide resistance in some insects.
Section 3
6. Briefly describe the denounced and discredited studies that have been presented to show that GM foods are unsafe for human consumption.
There was the researcher Arpad Pusztai who showed that this food had potential health hazards by domaging the immune system of rats. Also studies from Cornell University, Iowa state University and Switzerland pointed unexpected effects of genecally modified food on insects that benefit the ecosystem.
7. What are biotech companies doing to combat studies like these?
They invest tens of millionis of dollars to fight what they view as a nasty and hysterical campaign that misrepresented their products. They are founding scientific research, educational forums, lobbying legislators and regulators for farm groups.
8. What is the future of GM companies like Monsanto, DuPont and Novartis?
They will try to be acknowledged by the population. Influencing public opinion is critical. Perceptions create reality in the marketplace. Their revenues will go down and the stock prices will fluctuate. It is going to be hard for them to get investments for developing the next generation of GM products.
Section 4
9. Describe three problems that may prevent further development of GM foods.
The European Union rejected some types of GM food.
Some countries ask for specific labels on GM products and the producers refuse.
The issue could reach the highest level of international trade (WTO).
Section 5
10. What do consumer groups and those who speak for biotech companies want the Canadian government to do?
The government should give the public a better idea of how their food is vetted and approved. That way consumers would be more confident.
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Tuesday, December 2, 2008
Final Writing Test
Should Cat on a Hot Tin Roof win the play of the year award?
Art has always been a part of everybody. For someone it can be something really accessible, meaning that the more money you make out of your art, the more it is art. For some others it is something that only the specialists of this art, meaning the people who studied it and know a lot about it, can appreciate. Cat on a Hot Tin Roof is now part of the debate. Should this play win the play of the year? No, because it first depends on the difference between the socio-cultural contexts the play was made in at first and now. It also depends on why the play was made at first and why it was played now.
In 1955, things were not like today. Tennessee Williams had a hard time being who he was. He used to talk about subjects people never talked about before like alcoholism, gambling, homosexuality and violence. His plays shook everybody since he went over the line of what was accepted in life and what was put apart. He talked intelligently about the part of reality that tried to be hidden. Reality is reality and you cannot hide the fact that it exists. This is the main reason why this play is so great. It makes it the play of the year 1955. Now in 2008, now that all these things are known and that humans changed, it is the turn of a new artist to get the price for a new piece of art that will bring something new to society and that will make it evolve.
Cat on a Hot Tin Roof was written to change things. Tennessee Williams wanted to go forward because he had different ideas. In our society, the objective to show this play is first to remember a good piece of work that had his moment of success back in his context. Second, it is to show it the people that don’t know it because we can always learn from the past experiences in art to understand the present. The third reason is to obviously make money since the play was so popular. It could have been interpreted differently to show some originality in a classic. They could have shown something different, but it wasn’t. Nothing new came out of it. Even if everything was beautiful, everything was normal, usual, shined. Anybody that understands English could have seen the play and appreciate it. The play of the year deserves someone who brings something new, something different and original that is not going to necessarily please everyone just like when Tennessee wrote the play, in the name of art.
To conclude, Cat on a Hot Tin Roof shouldn’t get the award of ‘’play of the year’’ since it doesn’t bring anything new to art or society and also because the reasons why it was played were not for the art itself. Even though art is part of the industry, it is not a commercial, massively reproducible product.
497 words
Art has always been a part of everybody. For someone it can be something really accessible, meaning that the more money you make out of your art, the more it is art. For some others it is something that only the specialists of this art, meaning the people who studied it and know a lot about it, can appreciate. Cat on a Hot Tin Roof is now part of the debate. Should this play win the play of the year? No, because it first depends on the difference between the socio-cultural contexts the play was made in at first and now. It also depends on why the play was made at first and why it was played now.
In 1955, things were not like today. Tennessee Williams had a hard time being who he was. He used to talk about subjects people never talked about before like alcoholism, gambling, homosexuality and violence. His plays shook everybody since he went over the line of what was accepted in life and what was put apart. He talked intelligently about the part of reality that tried to be hidden. Reality is reality and you cannot hide the fact that it exists. This is the main reason why this play is so great. It makes it the play of the year 1955. Now in 2008, now that all these things are known and that humans changed, it is the turn of a new artist to get the price for a new piece of art that will bring something new to society and that will make it evolve.
Cat on a Hot Tin Roof was written to change things. Tennessee Williams wanted to go forward because he had different ideas. In our society, the objective to show this play is first to remember a good piece of work that had his moment of success back in his context. Second, it is to show it the people that don’t know it because we can always learn from the past experiences in art to understand the present. The third reason is to obviously make money since the play was so popular. It could have been interpreted differently to show some originality in a classic. They could have shown something different, but it wasn’t. Nothing new came out of it. Even if everything was beautiful, everything was normal, usual, shined. Anybody that understands English could have seen the play and appreciate it. The play of the year deserves someone who brings something new, something different and original that is not going to necessarily please everyone just like when Tennessee wrote the play, in the name of art.
To conclude, Cat on a Hot Tin Roof shouldn’t get the award of ‘’play of the year’’ since it doesn’t bring anything new to art or society and also because the reasons why it was played were not for the art itself. Even though art is part of the industry, it is not a commercial, massively reproducible product.
497 words
Final Listening Exam
What is Percy Schmeiser’s problem? /4
Monsanto is prosecuting him in court because he has monsanto's seeds DNA on his field without buying any of their special seeds.
What is Roundup used for? /4
It kills everything in the field exept Monsanto's special seeds.
How did the chemical company invent Roundup? /4
They modified the DNA of a normal seed. it took a bunch of years of research to get it.
What has Monsanto accused Schmeiser of doing? /4
Stealing their special seeds and planting them without paying for it. So in the end he made money with seeds he didn't pay for.
Why are the farmers pissed off? /4
Monsanto is claiming that they should pay a fine to them since they are using their special seeds with the copyrighted DNA. Actually they never asked for it, the wind just brought the seeds on their field and they are held responsible for not removing them.
How did Monsanto initially learn about Schmeiser? /4
They asked farmers around the neighborhood if they knew someone who uses the seeds without paying. A guy came to them claiming Schmeiser was. So Monsanto took a sample and realised that there was their DNA in his plants.
Did the company respect its policy on dealing with the farmer? Yes or no. Give a reason. /4
What tactics did the company use with another farmer? /4
The company just spread some of their 'roundup' to see if the farmers had the special seeds. Everything died indeed, exept the plants that had the modified DNA.
How did another farmer, Zilinski, get Monsanto’s DNA in his crops? /4
He traded some seeds with another farmer, which is an old farmer tradition. There were monsanto's special seeds in what he got back.
How did the company treat Zilinski? /4
They asked them to pay a fine of 28 thousand dollars since they were using their special seeds. Even though they trespassed Zilinski's property, the company claimed that the farmers were illegal.
What is Schmeiser’s next step? /4
He will make a lawsuit againts Monsanto and go as far as possible in this way to protect his rights and protect those of the other farmers in the same situation. He's pursuing them for having the Monsanto's seeds in his field without asking for it.
The narrator ends the segment with this question: “But the real question is this, can Monsanto or anybody put a patent on a piece of nature?” What do you think? /6
It is impossible to control nature, but it is possible to manipulate it. though it is easy to destroy, it is impossible to copy the nature's complexity.
Monsanto is prosecuting him in court because he has monsanto's seeds DNA on his field without buying any of their special seeds.
What is Roundup used for? /4
It kills everything in the field exept Monsanto's special seeds.
How did the chemical company invent Roundup? /4
They modified the DNA of a normal seed. it took a bunch of years of research to get it.
What has Monsanto accused Schmeiser of doing? /4
Stealing their special seeds and planting them without paying for it. So in the end he made money with seeds he didn't pay for.
Why are the farmers pissed off? /4
Monsanto is claiming that they should pay a fine to them since they are using their special seeds with the copyrighted DNA. Actually they never asked for it, the wind just brought the seeds on their field and they are held responsible for not removing them.
How did Monsanto initially learn about Schmeiser? /4
They asked farmers around the neighborhood if they knew someone who uses the seeds without paying. A guy came to them claiming Schmeiser was. So Monsanto took a sample and realised that there was their DNA in his plants.
Did the company respect its policy on dealing with the farmer? Yes or no. Give a reason. /4
No they don't respect their policy. They are not as friendly as they claim since they took a sample of Schmeiser's field and analysed it without his permission, trespassing his land.
What tactics did the company use with another farmer? /4
The company just spread some of their 'roundup' to see if the farmers had the special seeds. Everything died indeed, exept the plants that had the modified DNA.
How did another farmer, Zilinski, get Monsanto’s DNA in his crops? /4
He traded some seeds with another farmer, which is an old farmer tradition. There were monsanto's special seeds in what he got back.
How did the company treat Zilinski? /4
They asked them to pay a fine of 28 thousand dollars since they were using their special seeds. Even though they trespassed Zilinski's property, the company claimed that the farmers were illegal.
What is Schmeiser’s next step? /4
He will make a lawsuit againts Monsanto and go as far as possible in this way to protect his rights and protect those of the other farmers in the same situation. He's pursuing them for having the Monsanto's seeds in his field without asking for it.
The narrator ends the segment with this question: “But the real question is this, can Monsanto or anybody put a patent on a piece of nature?” What do you think? /6
It is impossible to control nature, but it is possible to manipulate it. though it is easy to destroy, it is impossible to copy the nature's complexity.
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
GMF
A) what we know about GMFs:
-There are some in almost every food
-they modify the food so it can be protected from cold, heat, pesticides
-it can be bad for your health
B) What we'd like to know
1. Where does GMF come from
2. Since when does it exist?
3. Is it true that is can cause cancer or other sicknesses?
4. What can we do to know if a food is GMed?
5. Does it have an impact on fertility?
6. Does it have an impact on the environment?
7. Is the Canadian government for or against it?
8. What are its benefits?
9. Wich foods in particular are GMed
10. What does David Suzuki have to say about GMF
-There are some in almost every food
-they modify the food so it can be protected from cold, heat, pesticides
-it can be bad for your health
B) What we'd like to know
1. Where does GMF come from
2. Since when does it exist?
3. Is it true that is can cause cancer or other sicknesses?
4. What can we do to know if a food is GMed?
5. Does it have an impact on fertility?
6. Does it have an impact on the environment?
7. Is the Canadian government for or against it?
8. What are its benefits?
9. Wich foods in particular are GMed
10. What does David Suzuki have to say about GMF
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
Questions on the Study Guide
Context: Write short answers.
What kind of family did Tennessee Williams (TW) have?
He came from a really dysfunctional family. his father was a drunkard and gambler. His sister was schizophrenic.
Where does his first name come from?
He got the nickname from a college friend.
What is the Pulitzer Prize?
The american prize is given to the top people in newspaper journalism, literature and music.
How was the original play changed for both Broadway and the cinema?
The broadway show revised the third act. the movie took out all mention of homosexuality.
How did TW die?
he choked on a stupid bottlecap.
What was the new American drama that TW represented?
the new american drama featured violence, rape, incest and alcoholism.
Plot Overview: Put the events in the correct order.
Maggie confesses to making love with Skipper. _D_
The family gets together with Mama and talks of Big Daddy’s cancer. _G_
Big Daddy asks Brick about his drinking problem. _A_
Maggie says the Brick’s brother and wife are plotting to take all the inheritance. _F_
Maggie announces that she’s pregnant. _H_
Maggie talks about Brick and Skipper’s love for each other. _C_
We learn that Brick injured his ankle. _I_
Big Daddy enters the room. _B_
??? _E_
Character List: Write down all the adjectives used to describe each character. Find the definition of the words you don’t know.
Margaret:
Brick:
Big Daddy:
Big Mama:
Mae:
Gooper:
Reverend Tucker:
Doctor Baugh:
The children:
Analysis of Major Characters:
Why is Maggie the most interesting character?
What does Brick’s injury represent?
Why does Maggie call Big Daddy a “redneck’?
What does Mama desperately want?
Themes, Motifs, and Symbols:
What was American society’s view of homosexuality at the time?
What are the two “lies” in the play?
What does the image of the “cat” represent?
What is Big Daddy’s narcissistic love for Brick?
What do the children represent?
Symbols:What do these three things symbolize?
Bed:
Console :
Crutch :
What kind of family did Tennessee Williams (TW) have?
He came from a really dysfunctional family. his father was a drunkard and gambler. His sister was schizophrenic.
Where does his first name come from?
He got the nickname from a college friend.
What is the Pulitzer Prize?
The american prize is given to the top people in newspaper journalism, literature and music.
How was the original play changed for both Broadway and the cinema?
The broadway show revised the third act. the movie took out all mention of homosexuality.
How did TW die?
he choked on a stupid bottlecap.
What was the new American drama that TW represented?
the new american drama featured violence, rape, incest and alcoholism.
Plot Overview: Put the events in the correct order.
Maggie confesses to making love with Skipper. _D_
The family gets together with Mama and talks of Big Daddy’s cancer. _G_
Big Daddy asks Brick about his drinking problem. _A_
Maggie says the Brick’s brother and wife are plotting to take all the inheritance. _F_
Maggie announces that she’s pregnant. _H_
Maggie talks about Brick and Skipper’s love for each other. _C_
We learn that Brick injured his ankle. _I_
Big Daddy enters the room. _B_
??? _E_
Character List: Write down all the adjectives used to describe each character. Find the definition of the words you don’t know.
Margaret:
Brick:
Big Daddy:
Big Mama:
Mae:
Gooper:
Reverend Tucker:
Doctor Baugh:
The children:
Analysis of Major Characters:
Why is Maggie the most interesting character?
What does Brick’s injury represent?
Why does Maggie call Big Daddy a “redneck’?
What does Mama desperately want?
Themes, Motifs, and Symbols:
What was American society’s view of homosexuality at the time?
What are the two “lies” in the play?
What does the image of the “cat” represent?
What is Big Daddy’s narcissistic love for Brick?
What do the children represent?
Symbols:What do these three things symbolize?
Bed:
Console :
Crutch :
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Mid-Term Writting Test
Introduction
As a canadian citizen, it is an absolute must to vote when there are elections. It's in that spirit that me and my team started this survey on Canadian elections. We first understood that the age groups had different needs so we targeted two groups: 18 to 30 years old and 30 and above. Our hypothesis for the final results was that the NDP would win.
Method
We wanted to concentrate our questions in a main topic: the environment. We covered different point of views to test our hypothesis. Obviously, we also asked tricky questions about the economy. Here are our questions.
1 - Do you vote?
2 - How old are you?
3 - Do you approve that the industries get taxed on their carbon dioxide emissions?
4 - Do you think that prioritizing ecology in our politics is realistic, or is it simply an utopian vision?
5 - Do your think the green shift for the liberals is a good idea?
6 - Do you think its a good idea to invest $1 billion dollars in Advanced Manufacturing Prosperity (AMP) fund to promote a greener, more competitive manufacturing sector?
7 - Is it important for you to defend the unique rights and culture of the Quebec?
8 - Do you think that there should be particular environment laws in Quebec?
9 - Do you approve that 400 million dollars will be invested, as a priority, into the police to improve our security?
10 - Do you approve a compression of the budget invested into culture to prioritize a "responsible" investment into the public funds?
11 - Do you think it's a good idea to invest in companies that are innovating in the new energy economy, and creating new green collar jobs for Canadians?
12 - Are you satisfied when Jack Layton says he will shorten health care waiting lists by training more doctors and nurses?
We didn't tell the people asked which question refered to which party. Question 3 and 4 were for the green party, 5 and 6 for the liberal party, 7 and 8 for the Bloc Québécois, 9 and 10 for the conservative party and 11 and 12 for the NDP.
20 people completed the survey, 10 under 30 and 10 above 30. We didn't ask people under 18 since they don't vote. We also didn't ask the people who don't vote.
Results
The results were quite unexpected. Since we asked people directly, we were able to get some reason for their choices. People really care about the environment. 73,3% of the total votes on the environmental questions were positive about it and revealed that people care and are active about it.
70% of the time, people were in favor for the ideas of the green party. Same results showed up about the liberal party. For the concervative, only a poor 17,5% acknowledged their ideas. For the bloc, it was 72,5% aproved. NDP was the winner with 78% of aproval for their ideas.
Our hypothesis were usually wrong. We thought that people saw a green country as realistic, but it wasn't. We were also wrong with the question about the 1 billion dollar investment when we thought that everybody would refuse it. We also thought that 100% positive was to be expected when asked about the unique rights and culture of Quebec. For the concervative party, we thought that the people over 30 would be more positive but actually everybody rejected it. Fortunatley, we hypothesis were right for the NDP.
Discussion
The results of our survey compared to the real results were more acurate than our hypothesis. Though the people we asked might have different ideas than the rest of Canada. Here are a few factors that might have influenced in the error factor.
- same city
- same cegep
- same family
- only a few people (20)
- not generalizable enough questions
The range of our survey was too short to predict a real winner for the canadian elections since it's a whole country we're talking about. Maybe a large corporative company should do it next time.
446 words
(752 + the 12 questions before editing)
As a canadian citizen, it is an absolute must to vote when there are elections. It's in that spirit that me and my team started this survey on Canadian elections. We first understood that the age groups had different needs so we targeted two groups: 18 to 30 years old and 30 and above. Our hypothesis for the final results was that the NDP would win.
Method
We wanted to concentrate our questions in a main topic: the environment. We covered different point of views to test our hypothesis. Obviously, we also asked tricky questions about the economy. Here are our questions.
1 - Do you vote?
2 - How old are you?
3 - Do you approve that the industries get taxed on their carbon dioxide emissions?
4 - Do you think that prioritizing ecology in our politics is realistic, or is it simply an utopian vision?
5 - Do your think the green shift for the liberals is a good idea?
6 - Do you think its a good idea to invest $1 billion dollars in Advanced Manufacturing Prosperity (AMP) fund to promote a greener, more competitive manufacturing sector?
7 - Is it important for you to defend the unique rights and culture of the Quebec?
8 - Do you think that there should be particular environment laws in Quebec?
9 - Do you approve that 400 million dollars will be invested, as a priority, into the police to improve our security?
10 - Do you approve a compression of the budget invested into culture to prioritize a "responsible" investment into the public funds?
11 - Do you think it's a good idea to invest in companies that are innovating in the new energy economy, and creating new green collar jobs for Canadians?
12 - Are you satisfied when Jack Layton says he will shorten health care waiting lists by training more doctors and nurses?
We didn't tell the people asked which question refered to which party. Question 3 and 4 were for the green party, 5 and 6 for the liberal party, 7 and 8 for the Bloc Québécois, 9 and 10 for the conservative party and 11 and 12 for the NDP.
20 people completed the survey, 10 under 30 and 10 above 30. We didn't ask people under 18 since they don't vote. We also didn't ask the people who don't vote.
Results
The results were quite unexpected. Since we asked people directly, we were able to get some reason for their choices. People really care about the environment. 73,3% of the total votes on the environmental questions were positive about it and revealed that people care and are active about it.
70% of the time, people were in favor for the ideas of the green party. Same results showed up about the liberal party. For the concervative, only a poor 17,5% acknowledged their ideas. For the bloc, it was 72,5% aproved. NDP was the winner with 78% of aproval for their ideas.
Our hypothesis were usually wrong. We thought that people saw a green country as realistic, but it wasn't. We were also wrong with the question about the 1 billion dollar investment when we thought that everybody would refuse it. We also thought that 100% positive was to be expected when asked about the unique rights and culture of Quebec. For the concervative party, we thought that the people over 30 would be more positive but actually everybody rejected it. Fortunatley, we hypothesis were right for the NDP.
Discussion
The results of our survey compared to the real results were more acurate than our hypothesis. Though the people we asked might have different ideas than the rest of Canada. Here are a few factors that might have influenced in the error factor.
- same city
- same cegep
- same family
- only a few people (20)
- not generalizable enough questions
The range of our survey was too short to predict a real winner for the canadian elections since it's a whole country we're talking about. Maybe a large corporative company should do it next time.
446 words
(752 + the 12 questions before editing)
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
"Cat On A Hot Tin Roof"
1. Where does the story take place?
2. Who are the characters?
3. What is their relationship?
4. What is the mood of scene?
5. What and whom are they talking about?
2. Who are the characters?
3. What is their relationship?
4. What is the mood of scene?
5. What and whom are they talking about?
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Consumer Behavior
1. What factors are included as cultural influences on consumer behavior?
There are four factors:
- cultural
- social
- personal
- psychological
2. What is culture?
Culture is a set of basic values, wants and behaviors learned in the family, through friends and in school.
3. What are some of the main characteristics of Canadian culture as identified by Maclean's 1999 and 2000 polls?
The three most important characteristics of canadian culture are:
- strong belief in their identity
- multicultural, multiracial aspects
- international role as peacekeeper
4. Why is it important to identify cultural shifts?
Cultural shifts help marketers develop and sell new products.
5. What is subculture?
Subculture is a group of people with shared value system; jewish people are a good example.
6. What are three Canadian subcultures mentioned in this text?
7. How has Scotiabank targeted Native -or Aboriginal- Canadians?
8. Why are ethnic consumers important to marketers?
9. How do ethnic groups feel about marketing and advertisements?
10. Why are Internet users an attractive market for advertiments?
11. Why are Internet users concerned about making online purchases?
12. What is social class?
There are four factors:
- cultural
- social
- personal
- psychological
2. What is culture?
Culture is a set of basic values, wants and behaviors learned in the family, through friends and in school.
3. What are some of the main characteristics of Canadian culture as identified by Maclean's 1999 and 2000 polls?
The three most important characteristics of canadian culture are:
- strong belief in their identity
- multicultural, multiracial aspects
- international role as peacekeeper
4. Why is it important to identify cultural shifts?
Cultural shifts help marketers develop and sell new products.
5. What is subculture?
Subculture is a group of people with shared value system; jewish people are a good example.
6. What are three Canadian subcultures mentioned in this text?
7. How has Scotiabank targeted Native -or Aboriginal- Canadians?
8. Why are ethnic consumers important to marketers?
9. How do ethnic groups feel about marketing and advertisements?
10. Why are Internet users an attractive market for advertiments?
11. Why are Internet users concerned about making online purchases?
12. What is social class?
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
Sentence paterns
1- Compound (2 ICs + ;)
A lot of people date online; most of them are insecure with meeting new people in front of them.
2- Compound (2 ICs + Adverb Conjuntion)
A lot of people date online; however, they can't develop a good rappor until the really meet.
3- Compound (2 ICs + Coodiating Conjuction)
A lot of people date online, but they might lie about themselves.
4- IC + DC + Subordinating Conjuction)
I eat tons of cookies even though it might not be good for me.
5- DC + , + IC
While I was climbing the Everest, the Yeti appeared in front of me!
A lot of people date online; most of them are insecure with meeting new people in front of them.
2- Compound (2 ICs + Adverb Conjuntion)
A lot of people date online; however, they can't develop a good rappor until the really meet.
3- Compound (2 ICs + Coodiating Conjuction)
A lot of people date online, but they might lie about themselves.
4- IC + DC + Subordinating Conjuction)
I eat tons of cookies even though it might not be good for me.
5- DC + , + IC
While I was climbing the Everest, the Yeti appeared in front of me!
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
Formative work 1
Reading Comprehension Course 1: Building a Strong Foundation
This lesson wasn't too hard. It takes the user by the hand and brings him to the goal slowly. If you need to learn exactly how to make a good reading comprehension summary, this is the perfect tool.
I hadn't much difficulty going through all the exercices. I got 2 mistakes in the final lesson that resumed all of the course.
Basically, it's great, but it was too long for the benefit, even though it's worth a try.
This lesson wasn't too hard. It takes the user by the hand and brings him to the goal slowly. If you need to learn exactly how to make a good reading comprehension summary, this is the perfect tool.
I hadn't much difficulty going through all the exercices. I got 2 mistakes in the final lesson that resumed all of the course.
Basically, it's great, but it was too long for the benefit, even though it's worth a try.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)